@benitez17, Thank you for your reply. Website brokers able to address these concerns, and able to take responsibility for the accuracy of business data provided, would achieve greater success. The ones that would/could protect buyers, rather than simply represent the sellers, would have a guaranteed source of repeat, exponentially increasing, business.
Business brokers here in the US function much the same way as Realtors. A real estate agent represents sellers, who agree to pay a percentage of the sales price to the sales agent. Buyers do not have similar representation. I brought in my own Realtor for the last house I bought, as the commission is then split equally between agents. I wanted her to represent me and not the seller. That didn't happen.
The third question, perceived as a repeat of 1 and 2 is an attempt to find financing options that directly address this concern. I suppose a contract can be written that discontinues all future payments on a loan, if due diligence did not uncover all liabilities or revenue was incorrect, but that may only work with seller financing unless there are investors specialising in web business finance. (This is an opportunity in itself.)
There are many different ways to fabricate proof of sales and income for web sites, and falsify site metrics. Even the best at DD may be fooled. It would seem that being able to safely buy a guaranteed revenue stream would result in a much higher multiple paid. Profitability for a broker, along with reputation, could result in market domination, especially if the ability to take responsibility for new paranoid buyers with capital was adequately addressed.


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks