I got it and ignored it because if you had the time to write that PM, you had the time to remove or revise your post, or state publicly that it didn't represent your true feelings. I don't know what you hoped to accomplish by privately asking me to hold off on the reaming you knew was coming, but I wasn't interested in waiting.
The tone was cemented by you well before my most recent reply.
If you don't mind my asking, where did you live in the US, for how long, and when? We aren't some homogeneous group, and living in the middle of Arkansas is quite different than living in San Francisco.
Several of the most popular shows in the US are UK knockoffs right now, so I could easily say that we are influenced by UK culture.
Based on my experience, I would dispute your claim that most non-Americans know more about America than Americans, and your heavy reliance on stereotypes and internet fodder, despite your stay here, is a prime example of that.
When your country spans a large part of an entire continent (and you could travel to the other countries on that continent until recently without a passport), are you really surprised that most Americans don't hold a passport? If we needed passports to travel between states, the percentage would be much higher I'm sure.
You clearly managed to pick up just enough to knowledge about America to spew out an seemingly endless stream of disparaging comments, so congratulations on that. Also, I found no evidence supporting your claim that 30% of Americans can't find the US on a map. Here's one article that I turned up quickly: http://blogs.news.com.au/news/splat/...rica_on_a_map/
Even if only 3% of Americans can't find the US on a map, that's not something to be happy about, but your eagerness to stretch the truth or pass along unfounded rumors in the name of some good old America bashing puts your true motives and feelings on display, and understanding America isn't simply a geography quiz.
You made broad, sweeping, baseless generalizations about how "the American public always falls for that kind of crap" and don't understand why I claim you're making broad sweeping generalizations, and why I am somewhat annoyed about it?
You've discredited yourself by relying on general stereotypes rather than data, or even personal experiences since you spent some time living in the US. Why would you do that, unless you were only interested in bashing the US?
I agree that that a discussion of American culture (both its pros and cons, of which there are many) would be interesting. It's becoming apparent that you aren't willing (and possibly not able) to have that conversation, which is unfortunate and surprising given your time here and the fact you seem to feel quite knowledgeable about the topic.
You don't have to assume anything because I specifically said that I don't believe that any segment of the population represents the whole, and didn't make any broad, sweeping generalizations like you did.
They were relying on new deposits to keep the scheme going, which is where the Ponzi scheme description comes into play, even though they weren't touting the site as an investment for the depositors to my knowledge. Whether you think the description as a Ponzi scheme is accurate or not, casinos aren't allowed to take part in fractional reserve banking and must be able to pay out any winnings at any time, and in no instance should customer deposits be used to pay investors, whether we are talking about a bank, a casino, or any other business that holds money for customers. It's a scam, plain and simple.
Who is being swayed or influenced? I asked you this already and you have refused to answer. Are you claiming that this operation wasn't a scam? If so, why?



Reply With Quote

Bookmarks