+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: PageRank Update Yesterday

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    7,292
    Blog Entries
    30
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked 2,654 Times in 1,503 Posts
    Rep Power
    101

    PageRank Update Yesterday

    There was a PR update yesterday. As usual there were "winners" and "losers".

    As most people know, PR doesn't matter a lot now and it's not the main determinant of the Google algo, but it's still followed quite seriously because people see it as an indicator of backlink building efforts paying off ... and it does influence how much advertisers pay for ads.

    As seems to be normal of recent PR updates, there's something quite screwed up with how some pages are gaining/losing PR. PR now bears no resemblance to how it originally worked. First, there's nofollow. Links using the nofollow tag are supposedly discounted by Google and don't pass PR. Also, some pages - such as privacy pages and pages called links.xxx - are blocked by Google from showing any PR and there are a few other exceptions.

    Even accounting for that, there's a problem with how PR seems to be flowing - it flows too fast sometimes and not at all at other times. Reports abound about new pages getting a PR3 despite having just one link from a PR0, and pages with several high PR backlinks not rising in PR at all.

    The main forum page on here has gone from a PR3 to a PR4 despite the fact that we haven't acquired any big new links ...and the main links to this forum (from the site in my signature) haven't changed visibly in PR. In fact, PR of our main page should have declined because as number of threads increase internal PR is being spread more.

    Some users have acquired PR to their profile pages like crabfoot and I, but members who have roughly the same number of posts like grynge and Kay seem to have been treated differently with some profiles getting PR and some ... not! KenW3's (join date June 2011) profile page has gone to a PR3 from his 199 posts while benitez17's (join date: Jan 2010) profile page still shows no PR despite his 1470 posts. There could be some logic to what Google is doing ... or they could have thrown some element of randomness into the allocation of pagerank.

    This is how some sites have fared.
    Webmasterworld (home): PR6
    DigitalPoint (forum home): PR6
    Flippa: PR5
    Websiteproperties: PR3
    Flipfilter: PR4
    Bizquest: PR4

    Google.co.uk has dropped from a PR9 to a PR8 and some major edu sites that I follow have dropped a notch or two. Adobe and Apple have both dropped from PR10s to PR9s.

    What have you noticed about the PR update and how have you fared?
    Show your support - Like us on Facebook

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Clinton For This Useful Post:

    KenW3 (November 8th, 2011)

  3. #2
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    2,554
    Blog Entries
    6
    Thanks
    1,345
    Thanked 1,570 Times in 840 Posts
    Rep Power
    53
    Actually I didn't even notice this one, all but one of my pages stayed the same with that one page losing all pr maybe for selling links which it isn't lol some of the smaller sites gained a pr1 or 2 but apart from that nothing really to report on my end.
    I got out of bed today staring at a ghost. Who forgot to float away, didnt have all that much to say. Wouldn't even tell me his own name.
    Non ducor, duco

  4. #3
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    No fixed abode (from Scotland)
    Posts
    4,018
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    3,100
    Thanked 2,079 Times in 1,281 Posts
    Rep Power
    69
    Not much to report from me either. Assuming the tool checker I used worked properly, then there's not much change since Panda. Most sites stayed the same, a couple of sites slipped down one rank, and a one-page "this domain is for sale site" is now a PR3, but I don't know what it was before.

    It's completely bizarre that a one-pager would have the same PR as my Not Delia site (previously PR4 and now PR3). It makes a complete mockery of using PR as a metric for anything.
    My Blog - latest posting: Facebook - broadcasting your secrets to the world
    Check out our Flickr account with 5 photos a day (when we get around to it) - latest: some old steam locos http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishexpat/

  5. #4
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    7,292
    Blog Entries
    30
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked 2,654 Times in 1,503 Posts
    Rep Power
    101
    One new site of mine that has zero dofollow links pointing to it and about 8 nofollow links has become a PR3!
    Show your support - Like us on Facebook

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Florida, USA
    Posts
    73
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 37 Times in 21 Posts
    Rep Power
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Clinton View Post
    One new site of mine that has zero dofollow links pointing to it and about 8 nofollow links has become a PR3!
    That's incredible ! I have 2 sites, each of which has just under 200 links and has just gone from PR2 to PR3. So, based on links and what I've read here, I agree that there would appear to be some degree of randomness involved in Google page ranking.

  7. #6
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    No fixed abode (from Scotland)
    Posts
    4,018
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    3,100
    Thanked 2,079 Times in 1,281 Posts
    Rep Power
    69
    I had another one-pager, with hardly any links in, which became a PR4 some time ago. Someone on another forum asked me how on earth I'd done it. I hadn't a bleedin' clue how I'd done it so I just said something along the lines of, "Just SEO, I guess".

    It's back to PR0 again, which is where it should be if PR is to make any sense at all.

    Why, oh why are people talking about PR again? It's like the Royal Wedding. People say they're not interested and yet they'll have "Let's ignore the Royal Wedding" parties.

    OK, 'fess up.

    Who believes that PR is a useful metric?

    How many of you who think it's nonsense still check your PR?

    I think it's nonsense but I'll check it only because other people are talking about it. Most likely there's some twisted prankster at G pressing a random number button to see how people react to any changes he makes. That would be a fun job!
    Last edited by Kay; November 8th, 2011 at 12:05 PM. Reason: typo
    My Blog - latest posting: Facebook - broadcasting your secrets to the world
    Check out our Flickr account with 5 photos a day (when we get around to it) - latest: some old steam locos http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishexpat/

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Kay For This Useful Post:

    KenW3 (November 8th, 2011)

  9. #7
    Top Contributor
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,595
    Thanks
    70
    Thanked 277 Times in 199 Posts
    Rep Power
    24
    Google must be monitoring what I write about them here and punishing my profile page because of it!

    I didn't see much change on my sites that I checked. I have an autoblog that jumped up to PR4 on the last update and held through this one, several internal pages on a high ranking blog were boosted, and that's about it.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to benitez17 For This Useful Post:

    KenW3 (November 8th, 2011)

  11. #8
    Top Contributor
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    846
    Thanks
    1,932
    Thanked 1,352 Times in 659 Posts
    Rep Power
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by benitez17 View Post
    Google must be monitoring what I write about them here and punishing my profile page because of it!
    That makes more sense than anything. For the EP home page, Crabfoot's article on the concepts of flipping websites rates a PR2. Clinton's VIP article on getting funding from angel investors gets a PR2 even though it's an extract. ...but my G FUD satire has a PR n/a. Somebody at G doing manual PR reviews doesn't have a sense of humour

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to KenW3 For This Useful Post:

    Clinton (November 8th, 2011)

  13. #9
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    2,554
    Blog Entries
    6
    Thanks
    1,345
    Thanked 1,570 Times in 840 Posts
    Rep Power
    53
    Quote Originally Posted by benitez17 View Post
    Google must be monitoring what I write about them here and punishing my profile page because of it!

    I didn't see much change on my sites that I checked. I have an autoblog that jumped up to PR4 on the last update and held through this one, several internal pages on a high ranking blog were boosted, and that's about it.
    Quote Originally Posted by KenW3 View Post
    That makes more sense than anything. For the EP home page, Crabfoot's article on the concepts of flipping websites rates a PR2. Clinton's VIP article on getting funding from angel investors gets a PR2 even though it's an extract. ...but my G FUD satire has a PR n/a. Somebody at G doing manual PR reviews doesn't have a sense of humour
    You would think anything I wrote would get a negative pr but they "still loves me"
    I got out of bed today staring at a ghost. Who forgot to float away, didnt have all that much to say. Wouldn't even tell me his own name.
    Non ducor, duco

  14. #10
    Established Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    N.E. Scotland
    Posts
    289
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked 154 Times in 78 Posts
    Rep Power
    7
    I thought most of the recent updates seem to reset the values making them a little tougher than before but for the most part mine have all stayed the same. PR still seems to pass as usual for me, I have plenty of new pages that have gone straight to 4,5 or 6 from one strong link.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. How come Flippa pages all have the same pagerank
    By Clinton in forum General & Miscellaneous
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 16th, 2011, 4:17 PM
  2. Do purchased domains / sites retain their PageRank?
    By Ajeet in forum Buying a Website, Blog, Internet Business
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: August 26th, 2011, 3:18 AM
  3. FP - How Much Would You Pay For A PageRank Domain
    By tim1505 in forum Site Flipping
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: April 12th, 2011, 1:27 PM
  4. Google Page Rank Update - PR update September 14th, 2010
    By Clinton in forum General & Miscellaneous
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: September 15th, 2010, 6:32 AM
  5. PageRank
    By BritishARMY in forum Website 101
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: July 23rd, 2010, 7:48 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts